- Anguilla
- Antigua
- Argentina
- Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao and St. Maarten
- Bahamas
- Belize
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- British Virgin Islands
- Canada LLP
- Canada RCGT
- Cayman Islands
- Chile
- Colombia
- Costa Rica
- Dominica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Grenada
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Jamaica
- Mexico
- Montserrat
- Nicaragua
- Panama
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Puerto Rico
- St Kitts
- St Lucia
- St Vincent and the Grenadines
- Trinidad & Tobago
- United States
- Uruguay
- Venezuela
- Albania
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Channel Islands
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gibraltar
- Greece
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Isle of Man
- Israel
- Italy - Bernoni
- Italy - Ria
- Kazakhstan
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Netherlands
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Serbia
- Slovak Republic
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Turkey
- Ukraine
- UK
- Uzbekistan

“A congruent approach could have been to involve the agency under which the assessee is registered and initiate actions through them, which would also bring administrative ease to the assessee,” said
Suresh Nandlal Rohira
Partner, Grant Thornton India LLP
This article appeared in Economic Times on 10th October, 2018.
Also appears under...